Why doesn’t South Korea use nuclear weapons to neutralize North Korean artillery?

 

Using nuclear weapons, whether as a preemptive strike or in response to aggression, is a highly controversial and dangerous option that could result in catastrophic consequences. These consequences include widespread death and destruction, environmental damage, and the potential use of nuclear weapons by other countries.

Additionally, it's unclear whether the use of nuclear weapons would be an effective way to neutralize North Korean artillery. While a nuclear detonation could potentially destroy underground tunnels and other structures where North Korea may be storing artillery, there is also the risk of radioactive fallout spreading beyond North Korea's borders, causing harm to civilians and the environment.

Furthermore, South Korea and its allies have been pursuing diplomatic and economic strategies to address the North Korean nuclear threat and bring about a peaceful resolution to the longstanding conflict on the Korean peninsula. This includes efforts to negotiate denuclearization with North Korea and impose economic sanctions on the regime.

In summary, while using nuclear weapons to neutralize North Korean artillery may seem like a quick solution, it is a highly risky and controversial option that could have severe consequences. South Korea and its allies have been pursuing other strategies to address the North Korean threat, including diplomacy and economic pressure, in hopes of achieving a peaceful resolution.